Mazkur maqolada turizm etikasi tushunchasi, uning asosiy tamoyillari va amaliy ahamiyati keng yoritilgan. Turizm etikasi — bu sayyohlar, xizmat ko‘rsatuvchilar, mahalliy aholi va ekologik muhit o‘rtasidagi axloqiy munosabatlarni tartibga soluvchi me’yorlar majmui bo‘lib, u o‘zaro hurmat, mas’uliyat, halollik, madaniyatlararo muloqot va adolat prinsiplariga asoslanadi. Maqolada turizmda etik qadriyatlarning sayyohlar va mezbonlar o‘rtasidagi ijobiy munosabatlarga, xizmat sifati va mamlakatning xalqaro imijiga ta’siri alohida ta’kidlangan. Ushbu maqolada muallif tomonidan tarixiy va madaniy meros ob’ektlariga nisbatan ehtiyotkorlik, ekologik barqarorlikka e’tibor, xizmat ko‘rsatishdagi madaniyat va mehmondo‘stlik kabi omillar barqaror turizm asosini tashkil etuvchi mezonlar sifatida ko‘rsatilgan. Shuningdek, etika va barqaror rivojlanish o‘rtasidagi bog‘liqlik, yosh avlodni etik ong asosida tarbiyalash, ta’lim tizimiga etik me’yorlarni kiritish zaruriyati ham tahlil etilgan. Maqola natijasida, turizmda etik yondashuv nafaqat axloqiy, balki ijtimoiy, iqtisodiy va madaniy jihatdan ham rivojlanishning muhim omili ekanligi xulosa sifatida ilgari suriladi.

The civil liability of physicians in Islamic jurisprudence and the statutory laws of Afghanistan is one of the complex and sensitive issues in medical law, referring to the responsibility of doctors towards patients and the consequences resulting from their medical actions. Civil liability of a physician means their obligation to compensate for financial, physical, or emotional damages caused to patients. This liability typically arises when a doctor fails to fulfill their duties or performs unauthorized or negligent medical procedures. The aim of this study is to examine the conditions and circumstances under which physicians are held civilly liable under Islamic jurisprudence and Afghan statutory law. The central question of this research is: under what conditions and circumstances is a physician liable according to Islamic jurisprudence and Afghanistan’s laws? It appears that if a physician causes harm to a patient due to negligence, lack of caution, or excessive treatment, they are considered liable. This research is conducted through library-based sources and employs a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that a physician cannot be deemed absolutely liable or entirely acquitted; rather, they are liable in cases where they fail to obtain prior consent (discharge of liability), lack sufficient expertise, or commit negligence. Otherwise, they are not considered liable.

Bugungi kunda sportning dolzarbligi jismoniy, ijtimoiy, iqtisodiy va psixologik sohalarda katta ahamiyatga ega. Sport nafaqat salomatlikni yaxshilash va jismoniy faollikni oshirish vositasi sifatida, balki jamiyatdagi ijtimoiy aloqalarni rivojlantirish, global miqyosda birlashish, iqtisodiy rivojlanish va yoshlarni tarbiyalashda ham muhim rol o‘ynaydi. Ushbu maqola sportning dolzarbligini har tomonlama tahlil qiladi. Uning ahamiyati jismoniy salomatlik, ruhiy farovonlik, ijtimoiy barqarorlik va iqtisodiy rivojlanish bilan bog‘liq jihatlar orqali o‘rganiladi. Sportning yoshlar tarbiyasidagi roli, gender tengligi masalalari, hamda sportda texnologiyalarning ta’siri ham yoritiladi. Maqolada sportning psixologik foydalari, homiylik va reklama orqali iqtisodiy imkoniyatlar va raqamli texnologiyalarning sport sohasidagi o‘rni ham alohida ko‘rib chiqiladi. Sportning global miqyosdagi ahamiyati va diplomatiya sohasidagi roli ham muhokama qilinadi.

International criminal proceedings have been consistently criticized due to the lack of an international legislative system, mandatory competent courts, and organized enforcement mechanisms. These factors are essential for establishing a comprehensive and credible legal framework. These shortcomings were particularly evident during the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, where reliance on the concept of "justice" could not fill the void left by the absence of "legality." The criticisms raised during and after these trials highlighted the importance of the principles of legality of crimes and punishments within international criminal law. Although the process of accepting and establishing these principles has been slow, it has progressed steadily. A historical examination of international criminal proceedings—from the Leipzig High Court in the early 20th century, the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials in the mid-century, the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the 1990s, and ad hoc tribunals like the Special Court for Sierra Leone to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the beginning of the 21st century—demonstrates a profound and gradual evolution in the acceptance and implementation of the principles of legality of crimes and punishments. This process began with denial and initial indifference to these principles and ultimately reached a point where adherence to them was explicitly stated as a legal necessity. This evolution reflects the continuous efforts of the international community to strengthen the legal foundations of international criminal proceedings and ensure the rights of the accused.

In order to effectively combat various forms of transnational and international crimes, the global community has intensified judicial cooperation and mutual legal assistance at the international level. One of the most significant forms of such cooperation is the extradition of offenders, which is carried out based on bilateral or multilateral agreements or in accordance with regional and international conventions. Linguistically, extradition refers to the act of reclaiming, requesting the return, or sending back an individual. In legal terminology, it encompasses a series of measures undertaken to return a criminal from the country of residence to the country where the crime was committed. As crime rates increase, offenders attempt to evade punishment by fleeing abroad, seeking refuge in another country to escape prosecution for their crimes. The practice of extradition has a long historical precedent, evident across various periods, including ancient, medieval, and modern times. The issue of extradition is governed by specific rules and regulations, encompassing legal principles, procedural mechanisms, and associated challenges.