The rule of law, as one of the fundamental pillars of a justice-oriented governmental system, plays a crucial and significant role in the realization of social justice. This concept emphasizes that all individuals, including governmental authorities, must be subjected to the same, clearly defined laws, with no one being exempt from accountability or punishment. In order to secure social justice, the effective enforcement of laws, adherence to principles of equality and proportionality, and their application across various judicial, executive, and governmental spheres is essential. This research aims to address the question of whether the rule of law has a direct and impactful effect on the realization of social justice in contemporary societies. A law-abiding state, functioning according to transparent and just laws, can contribute significantly to the realization of social justice. The core principles of the rule of law encompass the limitation of power, the supervision of governmental authorities, and access to an independent judiciary, all of which must be implemented within the framework of valid legal sources. Furthermore, the alignment between legal frameworks and social norms, the respect for both individual and collective rights, as well as access to fair trials, are indispensable components for achieving social justice. Ultimately, the rule of law, alongside legitimate legal resources, particularly in democratic and human rights-based systems, can foster the enhancement of citizens' rights and freedoms, contributing to the establishment of a just and sustainable society.

Mazkur maqolada turizm etikasi tushunchasi, uning asosiy tamoyillari va amaliy ahamiyati keng yoritilgan. Turizm etikasi — bu sayyohlar, xizmat ko‘rsatuvchilar, mahalliy aholi va ekologik muhit o‘rtasidagi axloqiy munosabatlarni tartibga soluvchi me’yorlar majmui bo‘lib, u o‘zaro hurmat, mas’uliyat, halollik, madaniyatlararo muloqot va adolat prinsiplariga asoslanadi. Maqolada turizmda etik qadriyatlarning sayyohlar va mezbonlar o‘rtasidagi ijobiy munosabatlarga, xizmat sifati va mamlakatning xalqaro imijiga ta’siri alohida ta’kidlangan. Ushbu maqolada muallif tomonidan tarixiy va madaniy meros ob’ektlariga nisbatan ehtiyotkorlik, ekologik barqarorlikka e’tibor, xizmat ko‘rsatishdagi madaniyat va mehmondo‘stlik kabi omillar barqaror turizm asosini tashkil etuvchi mezonlar sifatida ko‘rsatilgan. Shuningdek, etika va barqaror rivojlanish o‘rtasidagi bog‘liqlik, yosh avlodni etik ong asosida tarbiyalash, ta’lim tizimiga etik me’yorlarni kiritish zaruriyati ham tahlil etilgan. Maqola natijasida, turizmda etik yondashuv nafaqat axloqiy, balki ijtimoiy, iqtisodiy va madaniy jihatdan ham rivojlanishning muhim omili ekanligi xulosa sifatida ilgari suriladi.

Ushbu maqolada yoshlarni sportga jalb qilishning ahamiyati, maqsadlari, metodlari va usullari tahlil qilinadi. Maqolada yoshlarning jismoniy salomatligi, ruhiy rivojlanishi, ijtimoiy ko'nikmalari va akademik muvaffaqiyatlari uchun sportning qanday ta'sir ko'rsatishi ko'rib chiqiladi. Sport faoliyati nafaqat jismoniy sog'likni yaxshilash, balki yoshlarni o'ziga bo'lgan ishonchni oshirish, stressni kamaytirish va jamiyatga moslashishga yordam beradi. Yoshlarni sportga jalb qilish uchun pedagogik yondashuvlar, motivatsiya usullari va sport infratuzilmasi hamda turli xil sport turlari va faoliyatlari muhokama qilinadi. Maqola yoshlarni sportga rag'batlantirishda ishlatiladigan samarali metodlar va usullarni yoritadi, ularni jismoniy va ruhiy salomatlikka erishish uchun qanday samarali vosita sifatida taqdim etadi.

International criminal proceedings have been consistently criticized due to the lack of an international legislative system, mandatory competent courts, and organized enforcement mechanisms. These factors are essential for establishing a comprehensive and credible legal framework. These shortcomings were particularly evident during the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, where reliance on the concept of "justice" could not fill the void left by the absence of "legality." The criticisms raised during and after these trials highlighted the importance of the principles of legality of crimes and punishments within international criminal law. Although the process of accepting and establishing these principles has been slow, it has progressed steadily. A historical examination of international criminal proceedings—from the Leipzig High Court in the early 20th century, the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials in the mid-century, the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the 1990s, and ad hoc tribunals like the Special Court for Sierra Leone to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the beginning of the 21st century—demonstrates a profound and gradual evolution in the acceptance and implementation of the principles of legality of crimes and punishments. This process began with denial and initial indifference to these principles and ultimately reached a point where adherence to them was explicitly stated as a legal necessity. This evolution reflects the continuous efforts of the international community to strengthen the legal foundations of international criminal proceedings and ensure the rights of the accused.

In international documents, various definitions of torture have been presented, with the most comprehensive and reasonable being the definition provided in the Convention Against Torture of 1984. Article 1 of this Convention states that, for the purposes of the Convention, the term "torture" refers to any intentional act that causes severe physical or mental pain or suffering to a person, for the purpose of obtaining information or confessions from him or a third person. It also encompasses punishing a person for an act that he or a third person has committed or is suspected of committing, or threatening or coercing him or a third person. Punishment based on any form of discrimination is also considered torture. However, the same article adds that pain and suffering resulting from the inherent or incidental characteristics of lawful penalties are excluded from this definition. Among the international guarantees against torture in the international legal system are the Convention Against Torture of 1984, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Geneva Conventions, the Statute of the International Criminal Court, the European Convention on Human Rights, the American Convention on Human Rights, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Establishing the position of the prohibition of torture in the international legal system as one of the absolute principles contributes to preventing violations of the prohibition of torture, upholding human rights, and ensuring fair trials within the judicial process.