Mazkur maqolada O‘zbekistonda nodavlat notijorat tashkilotlari (NNT) faoliyatini tartibga soluvchi qonunchilik hujjatlarining holati va ularni takomillashtirish zarurati tahlil qilingan. NNTlar faoliyatini tartibga soluvchi normativ-huquqiy bazaning ko‘pligi, tarqoqligi va o‘zaro nomuvofiqligi ularning samarali faoliyat yuritishiga salbiy ta’sir ko‘rsatayotganini asoslab berilgan. Shuningdek, NNTlarning tashkiliy-huquqiy shakllarini aniq belgilashdagi muammolar, yuridik terminlarning chalkashligi, ayrim shakllarning qonunchilikda noto‘g‘ri tasniflanishi kabi muhim masalalarga e’tibor qaratilgan. Tadqiqot ishida xalqaro huquq tajribalariga asoslangan holda NNTlar faoliyatini tartibga soluvchi yagona kodeks ishlab chiqish, “NNT to‘g‘risida”gi qonunga yangi modda va ta’riflar kiritish, shuningdek “NNT” atamasini “jamoat tashkilotlari” bilan almashtirish kabi takliflarni ilgari surilgan. Maqola NNTlar faoliyatini huquqiy jihatdan tartibga solish mexanizmlarini takomillashtirishga oid dolzarb ilmiy-amaliy masalalarni yoritadi.
Ushbu maqolada tijorat banklarining moliyaviy barqarorligi va raqobatbardoshligini baholashda muhim ahamiyatga ega bo'lgan foyda va rentabellik ko'rsatkichlarini tahlil qilish metodologiyasi va amaliyoti o'rganilgan. Tadqiqotda rentabellikning asosiy ko'rsatkichlari, jumladan aktivlar rentabelligi (ROA), kapital rentabelligi (ROE), sof foiz marjasi (NIM) va xarajatlar koeffitsienti kabi indikatorlar o'rganilgan. Tahlil natijalariga ko'ra, bank rentabelligiga ta'sir etuvchi asosiy omillar aniqlangan va samaradorlikni oshirish yo'nalishlari taklif etilgan.
Ushbu maqolada Oʻtkir Hoshimov serqirra ijodkor, taniqli davlat arbobi, roman va qissalar muallifi hisoblanadi. Uning asarlarida hayotiy boʻlgan masalalar va urush vaqtida boʻlgan barcha qiyinchiliklar tasvirlangan. “Urushning soʻnggi qurboni” bu asarda ham urush vaqtida odamlarning qanday qiyinchilik koʻrgani, nimalar yetishmasligi ochiq tasvirlab berilgan. Hozirgi kun bilan bogʻlasak, hozirda ham zoʻravonliklar, tahdidlar davom etmoqda. Asar bizni tinchlikka undovchi kuch desak aslo mubolagʻa boʻlmaydi.
Legal capacity, defined as an individual’s competence to acquire rights and bear obligations, is recognized as a fundamental principle in all legal systems. This study conducts a comparative analysis of commercial capacity within the legal frameworks of Afghanistan and Egypt. The central question of the research is whether the rules governing capacity in commercial matters are similar to those applied in civil affairs, or whether there are fundamental differences between the two domains. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the concept of commercial capacity in the two legal systems and to examine whether legally incapacitated individuals are permitted to engage in commercial activities. The research adopts a descriptive-analytical method and is based on legal sources from both countries. The findings reveal that although the foundational principles of capacity are similar in both legal systems, there are notable differences in how these principles are applied. In particular, individuals under legal incapacity are not allowed to independently engage in commercial activities, even with the permission of a guardian or curator. Moreover, guardians or curators are also prohibited from conducting commercial activities on behalf of those under their care. This study is significant because a comparative examination of these laws can enhance the understanding and application of capacity rules in commercial matters in both countries.