In the digital era, social networks and mass media have become powerful tools influencing young people’s worldview, values, and professional preferences. This article analyzes how digital platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and television affect youth’s career choice. Using descriptive and analytical methods, the study identifies psychological, socio-cultural, and informational mechanisms of influence. The results show that more than 70% of youth decisions regarding their future professions are affected by online media content, role models, and influencers. Recommendations are provided for integrating media literacy into educational programs to ensure informed career decision-making.
Внедрение игровых форм в неигровой контекст: работу, учебу и повседневную жизнь - основные показатели геймификация. Геймификация использует естественные склонности людей к конкуренции, соревнованиям, сотрудничеству и достижениям. Геймификация в образовании, это применение игровых методик и элементов в процессе обучения. Указана роль компьютерных и настольных игр в развитии личности студентов.
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education represents one of the most transformative shifts of the 21st century. Language learning, as a cornerstone of communication and globalization, has been particularly influenced by these technological advances. This paper examines how AI enhances the effectiveness of language learning through personalized instruction, adaptive platforms, real-time feedback, and interactive applications. It draws on existing research, evaluates case studies, and explores pedagogical practices supported by AI. The discussion addresses both the opportunities and challenges of AI in language pedagogy and suggests strategies for sustainable implementation. The findings highlight that AI can serve as a powerful complement to traditional teaching while presenting ethical, social, and technological challenges that must be addressed in future policies.
Mazkur ilmiy maqola huquqiy ong va vijdon o‘rtasidagi dialektik-antagonistik munosabatlarni konseptual darajada tahlil etadi. Tadqiqot markazida normativ-huquqiy tizimning legitimiteti va shaxsiy vijdonning aksio-normativ imperativlari o‘rtasida yuzaga keladigan ziddiyatlar turadi. Ushbu ziddiyat, o‘z mohiyatiga ko‘ra, nafaqat pozitiv huquq va tabiiy huquq o‘rtasidagi tarixiy qarama-qarshilikning zamonaviy ko‘rinishi, balki insoniyat huquqiy tafakkurining eng chuqur ontologik va aksialogik muammolaridan biridir. Maqolada huquqiy pozitivizm, ius naturale, ratio legis, conscientia moralis kabi fundamental tushunchalar o‘zaro chog‘ishtirilib, ularning nazariy hamda amaliy oqibatlari yoritiladi. Tadqiqot jarayonida doktrinal-analitik, komparativ-huquqiy, shuningdek, fenomenologik-psixologik metodologiyalar uyg‘unlashtirilgan. Shunday integrativ yondashuv orqali huquqiy ongning normativ konstruktsiyalari va vijdonning etik-imperativ qaror mexanizmlari o‘rtasidagi disonans va rezonans jarayonlari ochib beriladi. Tahlil shuni ko‘rsatadiki, huquqiy ong — bu ijtimoiy tizim tomonidan majburiy tarzda in’ikos etilgan normativ majburiyatlar majmui bo‘lsa, vijdon — insonning ichki transsendental instantsiyasi, ya’ni huquqiy buyruqlardan mustaqil ravishda mavjud bo‘lgan moral imperativdir. Ularning to‘qnashuvi esa jamiyatda legitimitet inqirozi, shaxsda esa moral dissonans va psixologik fragmentatsiyani keltirib chiqaradi. Maqola doirasida, shuningdek, civil law va common law tizimlaridagi vijdon asosidagi huquqiy e’tiroz institutlari komparativ jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Natijada huquqiy normalar va vijdoniy imperativlar o‘rtasidagi qarama-qarshilikning universal shakllari aniqlanadi hamda ushbu to‘qnashuvni yumshatishga xizmat qiluvchi proportionalitas, subsidiaritas va humanitas iuris prinsiplari asosida takliflar ishlab chiqiladi. Mazkur tadqiqot nazariy jihatdan huquq falsafasi va huquq psixologiyasining konvergensiyasini chuqurlashtiradi, amaliy jihatdan esa adliya institutlarini insonparvarlik va aksio-huquqiy barqarorlik mezonlari asosida qayta talqin qilish zaruratini ko‘rsatadi. Shunday qilib, huquqiy ong va vijdon o‘rtasidagi to‘qnashuv nafaqat individual, balki sivilizatsion darajadagi muammo sifatida namoyon bo‘ladi.