Ushbu maqolada zilzilaga tayyorgarlik ko‘rish, zilzila vaqtida va undan keyin to‘g‘ri harakat qilish qoidalari yoritilgan. Zilzila — ogohlantirmaydigan tabiiy ofat bo‘lib, unga qarshi kurashishning yagona yo‘li — oldindan tayyorlik, bilim va hushyorlikdir. Maqolada xonadon xavfsizligini ta’minlash, favqulodda holatlar sumkasini tayyorlash, bolalar, yoshi katta va nogiron fuqarolar xavfsizligi, ruhiy tayyorgarlik, mahalla va jamoaning roli, texnologik vositalardan foydalanish va evakuatsiya rejasi haqida amaliy tavsiyalar berilgan. Shuningdek, zilzila vaqtida sarosimaga tushmaslik, “Yotish, qoplash va ushlash” qoidasi, xavfli zonalardan uzoqlashish va yordam so‘rash kabi asosiy harakatlar ham yoritilgan. Ushbu maqola aholining zilzilaga nisbatan ongli va tayyor bo‘lishiga, inson hayotini asrashga xizmat qiladi.

In order to effectively combat various forms of transnational and international crimes, the global community has intensified judicial cooperation and mutual legal assistance at the international level. One of the most significant forms of such cooperation is the extradition of offenders, which is carried out based on bilateral or multilateral agreements or in accordance with regional and international conventions. Linguistically, extradition refers to the act of reclaiming, requesting the return, or sending back an individual. In legal terminology, it encompasses a series of measures undertaken to return a criminal from the country of residence to the country where the crime was committed. As crime rates increase, offenders attempt to evade punishment by fleeing abroad, seeking refuge in another country to escape prosecution for their crimes. The practice of extradition has a long historical precedent, evident across various periods, including ancient, medieval, and modern times. The issue of extradition is governed by specific rules and regulations, encompassing legal principles, procedural mechanisms, and associated challenges.

In international documents, various definitions of torture have been presented, with the most comprehensive and reasonable being the definition provided in the Convention Against Torture of 1984. Article 1 of this Convention states that, for the purposes of the Convention, the term "torture" refers to any intentional act that causes severe physical or mental pain or suffering to a person, for the purpose of obtaining information or confessions from him or a third person. It also encompasses punishing a person for an act that he or a third person has committed or is suspected of committing, or threatening or coercing him or a third person. Punishment based on any form of discrimination is also considered torture. However, the same article adds that pain and suffering resulting from the inherent or incidental characteristics of lawful penalties are excluded from this definition. Among the international guarantees against torture in the international legal system are the Convention Against Torture of 1984, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Geneva Conventions, the Statute of the International Criminal Court, the European Convention on Human Rights, the American Convention on Human Rights, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Establishing the position of the prohibition of torture in the international legal system as one of the absolute principles contributes to preventing violations of the prohibition of torture, upholding human rights, and ensuring fair trials within the judicial process.

International criminal proceedings have been consistently criticized due to the lack of an international legislative system, mandatory competent courts, and organized enforcement mechanisms. These factors are essential for establishing a comprehensive and credible legal framework. These shortcomings were particularly evident during the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, where reliance on the concept of "justice" could not fill the void left by the absence of "legality." The criticisms raised during and after these trials highlighted the importance of the principles of legality of crimes and punishments within international criminal law. Although the process of accepting and establishing these principles has been slow, it has progressed steadily. A historical examination of international criminal proceedings—from the Leipzig High Court in the early 20th century, the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials in the mid-century, the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the 1990s, and ad hoc tribunals like the Special Court for Sierra Leone to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the beginning of the 21st century—demonstrates a profound and gradual evolution in the acceptance and implementation of the principles of legality of crimes and punishments. This process began with denial and initial indifference to these principles and ultimately reached a point where adherence to them was explicitly stated as a legal necessity. This evolution reflects the continuous efforts of the international community to strengthen the legal foundations of international criminal proceedings and ensure the rights of the accused.

Ushbudagi shaxsiy tarixiy jamiyati tarkibi, uningy ildizlari va maqola bosqichlari tahlili. shaxs, yig'ilish, miting va namoyishlar huquqi fuqarolik jamiyatining ajralmas elementi sifatida ko'rib chiqiladi. Sharq va G'arb tafakkuridagi fuqarolik jamiyati talqinlari o'ziga xos farqlar yoritilib, O'zbekistonga tegishli e'tibor qaratiladi. , "Farolarning mitinglari, yig'ilishlari va namoyishlari to'g'risida"gi qonun loyihasining mazmuni, asosiy prinsip va taktikaviy tahlili. Ushbu maqola xodimlarining ijtimoiy faolligi, o'ziga xos uyg'unlikni ochib tashlash va qonunchilik amaliyoti.