This study explores the profound impact of armed conflict on women in Gaza, focusing on the legal and humanitarian challenges they face. As one of the most vulnerable groups in conflict zones, women in Gaza endure a wide spectrum of hardships, including gender-based violence, displacement, exploitation, and the collapse of essential services such as healthcare and education. The protracted blockade, repeated military operations, and destruction of infrastructure have intensified their vulnerability and deepened existing gender inequalities. This research adopts an analytical-legal approach to examine the extent to which international legal frameworks particularly the Geneva Conventions, their Additional Protocols, and UN Security Council Resolution 1325 address the protection of women in armed conflict. Despite these legal commitments, implementation in Gaza remains inadequate due to political, logistical, and security constraints, with little accountability for violations. The study also evaluates the role of local women’s rights groups in responding to these challenges. It concludes that stronger international accountability, effective enforcement of legal obligations, and greater inclusion of women in peacebuilding and reconstruction efforts are essential. By highlighting the specific vulnerabilities of women in Gaza, this research aims to contribute to more comprehensive and gender-sensitive strategies in conflict and post-conflict settings.

The rule of law, as one of the fundamental pillars of a justice-oriented governmental system, plays a crucial and significant role in the realization of social justice. This concept emphasizes that all individuals, including governmental authorities, must be subjected to the same, clearly defined laws, with no one being exempt from accountability or punishment. In order to secure social justice, the effective enforcement of laws, adherence to principles of equality and proportionality, and their application across various judicial, executive, and governmental spheres is essential. This research aims to address the question of whether the rule of law has a direct and impactful effect on the realization of social justice in contemporary societies. A law-abiding state, functioning according to transparent and just laws, can contribute significantly to the realization of social justice. The core principles of the rule of law encompass the limitation of power, the supervision of governmental authorities, and access to an independent judiciary, all of which must be implemented within the framework of valid legal sources. Furthermore, the alignment between legal frameworks and social norms, the respect for both individual and collective rights, as well as access to fair trials, are indispensable components for achieving social justice. Ultimately, the rule of law, alongside legitimate legal resources, particularly in democratic and human rights-based systems, can foster the enhancement of citizens' rights and freedoms, contributing to the establishment of a just and sustainable society.

В данной статье рассматриваются правила наследования по закону в Республике Узбекистан. Он углубляется в правовую основу, регулирующую наследство, фокусируясь на ключевых принципах и правилах, изложенных в Гражданском кодексе Узбекистана. В статье представлен обзор различных категорий наследников, порядка наследования и распределения наследства умершего. Кроме того, рассматриваются процедуры предъявления претензий на право наследования и возможные правовые вопросы, которые могут возникнуть в процессе наследования. Подчеркивая особенности узбекского наследственного права, данная статья направлена на предоставление всестороннего понимания того, как регулируется и осуществляется наследование в стране.

Ushbu maqolada Saljuqiylar davlatining ma’muriy boshqaruvi, undagi davlat lavozimlari va ularning vazifalari yoritildi. Maqolada O‘rta asrlarda faoliyat yuritgan ushbu davlatning devon va boshqaruv tizimi va dargohda faoliyat ko‘rsatgan davlat lavozimlari ularning vazifalari haqida ma’lumotlar ochib berildi.

In international documents, various definitions of torture have been presented, with the most comprehensive and reasonable being the definition provided in the Convention Against Torture of 1984. Article 1 of this Convention states that, for the purposes of the Convention, the term "torture" refers to any intentional act that causes severe physical or mental pain or suffering to a person, for the purpose of obtaining information or confessions from him or a third person. It also encompasses punishing a person for an act that he or a third person has committed or is suspected of committing, or threatening or coercing him or a third person. Punishment based on any form of discrimination is also considered torture. However, the same article adds that pain and suffering resulting from the inherent or incidental characteristics of lawful penalties are excluded from this definition. Among the international guarantees against torture in the international legal system are the Convention Against Torture of 1984, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Geneva Conventions, the Statute of the International Criminal Court, the European Convention on Human Rights, the American Convention on Human Rights, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Establishing the position of the prohibition of torture in the international legal system as one of the absolute principles contributes to preventing violations of the prohibition of torture, upholding human rights, and ensuring fair trials within the judicial process.